Section 129 of the CGST Act when the owner of the goods does NOT come forward after a vehicle is detained for moving without an E-Way Bill.
Section 129 of the CGST Act when the owner of the goods does NOT come forward after a vehicle is detained for moving without an E-Way Bill.
⚠️ When the Owner Does NOT Come Forward — Section 129(1)(b)
If the owner of the goods does not come forward to pay tax and penalty, the law treats it as a more serious offence.
In this case:
✅ Penalty = 50% of the Value of Goods (after reducing tax portion)
This penalty is mandatory, not discretionary.
Formula:
Penalty = 50% × (Value of Goods – Tax Amount)
This nearly always results in a very high penalty.
📌 Example
-
Value of goods = ₹2,00,000
-
Tax payable (18%) = ₹36,000
Penalty = 50% × (2,00,000 – 36,000)
Penalty = 50% × 1,64,000 = ₹82,000
Total payable for release:
-
Tax: ₹36,000
-
Penalty: ₹82,000
➡️ ₹1,18,000
🚛 Why is penalty higher when the owner doesn’t come forward?
Because GST law treats it as a case where:
-
Ownership cannot be established
-
Invoice may be fake
-
Goods may be unaccounted
-
Tax evasion is suspected
Therefore, Section 129(1)(b) imposes a much heavier penalty.
📝 Process Flow When Owner Doesn’t Come Forward
-
Vehicle intercepted
-
Goods + vehicle detained (MOV-06)
-
Notice issued (MOV-07)
-
Owner does not respond
-
Penalty = 50% of value of goods (after tax deduction)
-
Release only after full payment
-
If not paid within 14 days → confiscation proceedings (Section 130) may start
Comments
Post a Comment